CRISP News Archive

SEPT 2022 – ICWA Briefing Focuses on Native American Children

ICWA Briefing Focuses on Native American Children

From left: Kathryn Isom-Clause, Bureau of Indian Affairs; Dr. Angelique Day, Sonia Begay, and Dr. Charles E. Lewis Jr.

Tuesday, September 20, 2022, social workers, advocates, and Hill staffers gathered in Room HV201 in the Capitol Visitor Center to discuss how Congress might respond if the United States Supreme Court rules the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) is unconstitutional. Co-hosted by CRISP and the National Foster Youth Initiative, the briefing was held in conjunction with the Congressional Social Work Caucus and the Congressional Caucus on Foster Youth. Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA-13), chair of the Social Work Caucus, provided a video greeting to set the tone for the briefing.

The focus of the briefing was to discuss how Congress might respond should the Supreme Court declare ICWA to be unconstitutional. Several bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives to protect the well-being of Native American families: H.R.1688, the Native American Child Protection Act was introduced on March 21 by Reps. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ-7), Sharice Davids, and Dusty Johnson (R-SD) and passed in the House on May 12, 2021; H.R.4348, the Tribal Family Fairness Act, was introduced by Rep. Bass on July 7, 2021; and H.R.8954, the Strengthening Tribal Families Act, was introduced by Reps. Judy Chu, Don Bacon (R-NE-2), Raul Ruiz (D-CA-36), and Tom Cole (R-OK-4) on September 23, 2022.

On November 9, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear Brackeen v. Haaland and three other cases challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act passed in 1978 giving tribal governments primary jurisdiction over the removal of Native American children in custody, foster care, adoption cases, and their placement in appropriate homes. The Fifth Court of Appeals issued a divided ruling in April 2021. Defenders of ICWA point to a report recently released by the U.S. Department of the Interior detailing atrocities committed at boarding schools against Indigenous children as justification for needing ICWA’s federal protections. The Department of Interior report showed that between 1819 and 1969, the United States operated or supported 408 boarding schools across 37 states, including 21 schools in Alaska and 7 schools in Hawaii. The report described the boarding school environment, housing Native American children as young as four years old, as fostering “rampant physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; disease; malnourishment; overcrowding; and lack of health care.”

Thirty-three Senators and 54 Members of the House of Representatives filed an amicus brief in support of the constitutionality of Congress’s authority to legislate the affairs of Native American tribes and their people and urged the Supreme Court to “uphold the Indian Child Welfare Act’s constitutionality in all respects.” Numerous amici briefs have been filed supporting ICWA’s constitutionality, including briefs by several tribal nations and the American Civil Liberties Union.

Congresswoman Karen Bass (D-CA-37), founder and co-chair of the Caucus on Foster Youth was represented by senior advisor Camille Loya and Cortez Carey, legislative aide to Rep. Bass and director of the Caucus on Foster Youth.

CRISP Legislative Director Angelique Day, an associate professor at the University of Washington School of Social Work and a descendant of the Ho Chunk nation, consisted of Kathryn Isom-Clause, Bureau of Indian Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Economic Development; Kristen Torres, MSW, child welfare legislative aide for Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA-27); and Sonia Begay, a member of the Navajo Nation and grandparent caregiver who provided compelling testimony about her experiences with ICWA during the time she sought parental custody of her grandchildren who attended the briefing. 

Among the congressional offices represented were Francisco Sabate, legislative aide to Rep. Barbara Lee; Rani Williams, legislative assistant, and Aden Klein, congressional intern, representing Congresswoman Sharice Davids (D-KS-3), co-chair of the Congressional Native American Caucus. Also in attendance was Heather Zenone, former Senior Advisor for Child Welfare for Rep. Bass, and now Director of IPA Administration for Native Americans for Casey Family Programs. The briefing began with opening remarks from CRISP director Dr. Charles E. Lewis Jr., followed by remarks from Rebecca Louve Yao, executive director of the National Foster Youth Institute, a nonprofit organization founded by Rep. Bass to revolutionize the foster care system. Camille Loya provided remarks on behalf of Rep. Bass.

The most compelling testimony was delivered by Sonia Begay. She told her story about how her oldest son was struggling with substance abuse and temporarily lost custody of his three children to the Kentucky foster care system.

She was not granted custody of the children and was appalled when she arrived at the state office and her grandson’s hair had been cut. His hair had never been cut before because of traditional culture. She said it reminded her of the photos she had seen of native children being taken into boarding schools in the 1940s and 50s. His hair had been cut within the span of 12 hours of him going into state care. She then contacted the Navajo Nation social services and the Kentucky social services refused to grant her custody despite the Navajo representative citing the need to comply with ICWA. She said the trauma of those events still haunts her. She was not living on the reservation, so she did not have access to local resources but turned to organizations and social workers seeking help and guidance. She discovered bruises on the back and buttocks of her youngest granddaughter. When social services saw the injuries, they accused the grandmother of abuse.

The tribe went into action, sending a legal team to help get the children released to their grandmother. The process took more than nine months. Eventually, she received a formal apology from Kentucky social services. She credits the ICWA for allowing her to take custody and care for her grandchildren.

Sonia Begay provided emotional testimony.

Open Letter to the Supreme Court in Support of the ICWA

This destruction of Tribal culture was fully documented in a report released by the United States Department of the Interior following more than a year-and-a-half of investigating atrocities committed at boarding schools against Tribal people.

The report details the activities of 408 federal Indian board schools across 37 states that operated between 1819 and 1969.[i] The report describes the boarding school environment as fostering “rampant physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; disease; malnourishment; overcrowding; and lack of health care” on children as young as four years old.[ii] The report acknowledges the federal government used money from the Indian Trust Funds to pay the schools, including those managed by religious organizations. These destructive practices resulted in the Tribal children being removed from their homes without parental consent and forced into environments designed to eviscerate generational bonds by destroying language and culture. The Meriam report, conducted in 1928, looked at the condition of Native Americans in the U.S. and found the “main disruption to the Indian family and tribal relations had come from the Federal Indian boarding school system.”[iii]

Placing Tribal children in non-Tribal environments not only exacerbated the existential threat to the language and culture of Tribal nations, but also did irreparable harm to children who were separated from their families, culture, and heritage. Early childhood is a key period of mental and emotional growth that can predict the course of the lives of individuals. The unique cultural influences children respond to from birth, including customs around food, artistic expression, language, and religion, affect the way children develop emotionally, socially, physically, and linguistically. Tribal children who are removed from their homes and placed in environments that are culturally unfamiliar often suffer trauma and psychological harm.[iv] Any separation of a child from her or his parent is a traumatic experience. The ICWA provides robust protections for the rights of Tribal parents.[v]

Not only has the Indian Child Welfare Act provided much-needed relief for Tribal families and children experiencing household stress while protecting them from excesses from child protection services agencies, but it has also provided a model for child welfare generally and is recognized as the “gold standard” for promoting kinship care as the preferable foster care placement. The Families First Prevention Act (2017) is legislation that best promotes the active efforts requirement.[vi] Since the passage of ICWA, 48 states (all but New Hampshire and West Virginia) have adopted language that favors relatives when children are being placed outside of their homes.[vii] [viii] Twenty-six states require social services agencies to exercise “due diligence,” when seeking possible kin and fictive kin for children.[ix]

It is critical the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act at a time when children in the United States are facing enormous challenges to their mental well-being. According to the American Psychological Association, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated a longstanding problem.[x] Prior to the pandemic, data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) found 1 in 5 children had a mental disorder, but only 20 percent of those children received care from a mental health provider. The CDC released a report in February of 2022 citing a pronounced increase in children seeking mental health services.[xi] Given the uniquely tragic history of trauma perpetrated by the federal government on Tribal families and children, Congress has every right to pass legislation to protect Tribal children from further psychological damage. The Supreme Court should not take away the protections afforded by the ICWA in the name of colorblindness or by expanding the rights of non-Tribal individuals.

ENDORSED BY:

• Amy H Children’s Advocacy Institute
• Center for the Study of Social Policy
• Child Welfare League of America
• Children’s Defense Fund
• Children’s Rights
• Congressional Research Institute for Social Work & Policy
• iFoster
• Nebraska Appleseed
• Partners for Our Children
• Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe
• Prevent Child Abuse America

[i] Sumrall, F. (2022, May 17). Federal Indian boarding schools implemented systematic cultural whitewashing; new report reveals. MyNorthwest.com. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://mynorthwest.com/3475548/federal-indian-boarding-schools-implemented-systematic-cultural-whitewashing-new-report-reveals/

[ii] Bureau of Indian Affairs. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/dup/inline-files/bsi_investigative_report_may_2022_508.pdf

[iii] Sumrall, F. (2022, May 17). Federal Indian boarding schools implemented systematic cultural whitewashing; new report reveals. MyNorthwest.com. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://mynorthwest.com/3475548/federal-indian-boarding-schools-implemented-systematic-cultural-whitewashing-new-report-reveals/

[iv] Akee, R. (2018, October 12). 40 years ago we stopped the practice of separating American Indian families. let’s not reverse course. Brookings. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-
front/2018/10/11/40-years-ago-we-stopped-the-practice-of-separating-American-Indian-families-lets-not-reverse-course/

[v] The rights of a parent under the Indian Child Welfare Act. Law Office of Bryan Fagan. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.bryanfagan.com/family-law-blog/2018/december/the-rights-of-a-parent-under-the-indian-child-we/

[vi] ICWA brief final – partners for our children. (2019, February). Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://partnersforourchildren.org/sites/default/files/ICWA%20BRIEF%20final.pdf

[vii] Child Welfare Information Gateway. (n.d.). Kinship Care definition. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/outofhome/kinship/

[viii] Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2018). Placement of Children with Relatives. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/placement.pdf

[ix] Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2018). Placement of Children with Relatives. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/placement.pdf

[x] Abramson, A. (2022, January 1). Children’s mental health is in crisis. Monitor on Psychology. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/01/special-childrens-mental-health

[xi] Radhakrishnan, L., Leeb, R. T., Bitsko, R. H., Carey, K., Gates, A., Holland, K. M., Hartnett, K. P., Kite-Powell, A., DeVies, J., Smith, A. R., van Santen, K. L., Crossen, S., Sheppard, M., Wotiz, S., Lane, R. I., Njai, R., Johnson, A. G., Winn, A., Kirking, H. L., … Anderson, K. N. (2022). Pediatric emergency department visits associated with mental health conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, January 2019–January 2022. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 71(8), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7108e2